From 9901dc7f51edffbb805b8c154757fbc5b825c543 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Felipe Cardoso Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2025 13:14:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] docs: add Syndarix Requirements Document (v2.0) - Created `SYNDARIX_REQUIREMENTS.md` in `docs/requirements/`. - Document outlines Syndarix vision, objectives, functional/non-functional requirements, system architecture, user stories, and success metrics. - Includes detailed descriptions of agent roles, workflows, autonomy levels, and configuration models. - Approved by the Product Team, targeting enhanced transparency and structured development processes. --- docs/requirements/SYNDARIX_REQUIREMENTS.md | 2405 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 2405 insertions(+) create mode 100644 docs/requirements/SYNDARIX_REQUIREMENTS.md diff --git a/docs/requirements/SYNDARIX_REQUIREMENTS.md b/docs/requirements/SYNDARIX_REQUIREMENTS.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0a45b1e --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/requirements/SYNDARIX_REQUIREMENTS.md @@ -0,0 +1,2405 @@ +# Syndarix Requirements Document + +**Version:** 2.0 +**Last Updated:** 2025-12-29 +**Status:** Approved +**Document Owner:** Product Team + +--- + +## Table of Contents + +1. [Executive Summary](#1-executive-summary) +2. [Problem Statement and Objectives](#2-problem-statement-and-objectives) +3. [Stakeholder Analysis](#3-stakeholder-analysis) +4. [Functional Requirements](#4-functional-requirements) +5. [Non-Functional Requirements](#5-non-functional-requirements) +6. [System Architecture Overview](#6-system-architecture-overview) +7. [Data Requirements](#7-data-requirements) +8. [Integration Requirements](#8-integration-requirements) +9. [User Stories and Use Cases](#9-user-stories-and-use-cases) +10. [Acceptance Criteria](#10-acceptance-criteria) +11. [Constraints and Assumptions](#11-constraints-and-assumptions) +12. [Risks and Mitigations](#12-risks-and-mitigations) +13. [Success Metrics](#13-success-metrics) +14. [Glossary](#14-glossary) + +--- + +## 1. Executive Summary + +### 1.1 Vision Statement + +Syndarix is an AI-powered software consulting agency platform that orchestrates specialized AI agents to deliver complete software solutions autonomously. It transforms the software development lifecycle by providing a virtual consulting team where AI agents collaboratively plan, design, implement, test, and deliver software with minimal human intervention. + +### 1.2 Key Objectives + +| Objective | Description | Success Metric | +|-----------|-------------|----------------| +| **OBJ-001** | Reduce manual project management overhead | 80% reduction in PM time per project | +| **OBJ-002** | Deliver production-ready code autonomously | 90% of deliverables pass first review | +| **OBJ-003** | Maintain full transparency and client control | 100% artifact visibility, intervention at any point | +| **OBJ-004** | Support varying client technical proficiency | Both technical and "auto" modes functional | +| **OBJ-005** | Scale to multiple concurrent projects | Support 10+ active projects per instance | + +### 1.3 Target Audience + +- **Primary:** Internal development teams seeking AI-augmented development +- **Secondary:** Company stakeholders requiring software solutions +- **Future:** External clients (post-v1, if multi-tenant support added) + +### 1.4 Scope Summary + +**In-Scope (v1):** +- Multi-agent orchestration with 10 specialized roles +- Complete SDLC workflow automation +- Configurable autonomy levels +- MCP-first architecture for all integrations +- Project complexity wizard (Script/Simple/Medium/Complex) +- Full artifact delivery (code, docs, ADRs, tests) + +**Out-of-Scope (v1):** +- Multi-tenant SaaS deployment +- Public API access +- Mobile application +- Real-time video collaboration +- Third-party marketplace integrations + +--- + +## 2. Problem Statement and Objectives + +### 2.1 Problem Statement + +Modern software development faces a paradox: despite advances in AI coding assistants, developers spend as much time managing AI as doing the work themselves. Key pain points include: + +1. **Context Switching Overhead:** Developers constantly switch between tools, losing context and productivity +2. **Knowledge Fragmentation:** Project knowledge scattered across conversations, documents, and code +3. **AI Babysitting:** Current AI tools require constant human guidance and validation +4. **Inconsistent Quality:** No standardized process for AI-generated code review and testing +5. **Missing Orchestration:** No unified system to coordinate multiple AI capabilities +6. **Limited Autonomy:** Existing tools cannot handle end-to-end project delivery + +### 2.2 Proposed Solution + +Syndarix addresses these challenges through: + +1. **Structured Agency Model:** Specialized AI agents with defined roles, expertise, and communication protocols +2. **Unified Knowledge Base:** Centralized, searchable repository with project and agent scoping +3. **Autonomous Workflows:** Agents work independently with checkpoints for human intervention +4. **Quality Gates:** Built-in review processes, testing requirements, and approval workflows +5. **MCP Orchestration:** Single integration layer for all external tools and services +6. **Configurable Control:** Client-defined autonomy levels from full control to fully autonomous + +### 2.3 Value Proposition + +| Stakeholder | Value Delivered | +|-------------|-----------------| +| **Developers** | Focus on creative work while AI handles routine tasks | +| **Project Managers** | Automated backlog management, sprint planning, and progress tracking | +| **Business Owners** | Faster time-to-market with consistent quality | +| **Architects** | AI-assisted design with ADR documentation | +| **QA Teams** | Automated test generation and execution | + +### 2.4 Business Objectives + +| ID | Objective | Target | Timeline | +|----|-----------|--------|----------| +| **BO-001** | Reduce project delivery time | 50% faster | Q2 2025 | +| **BO-002** | Decrease bug density in production | 40% reduction | Q3 2025 | +| **BO-003** | Improve documentation coverage | 95% coverage | Q2 2025 | +| **BO-004** | Enable non-technical stakeholders to request features | 100% accessibility | Q2 2025 | +| **BO-005** | Maintain full auditability and compliance | SOC2-ready processes | Q4 2025 | + +--- + +## 3. Stakeholder Analysis + +### 3.1 Human Stakeholders + +#### 3.1.1 Client (Human User) + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Role** | Project requester and primary beneficiary | +| **Responsibilities** | Define requirements, approve milestones, provide feedback | +| **Technical Proficiency** | Varies: Technical (detailed specs) or Auto (high-level goals) | +| **Interaction Mode** | Web UI, chat interface, approval workflows | +| **Success Criteria** | Receives complete, working software with all artifacts | + +#### 3.1.2 System Administrator + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Role** | Platform operator and maintainer | +| **Responsibilities** | Configure agents, manage integrations, monitor health | +| **Technical Proficiency** | High (DevOps/SRE level) | +| **Interaction Mode** | Admin panel, CLI, configuration files | +| **Success Criteria** | Stable platform operation, successful agent orchestration | + +### 3.2 AI Agent Stakeholders + +Each agent type represents a specialized role in the software development lifecycle. Agents can be spawned as multiple instances with unique identities and domain knowledge. + +#### 3.2.1 Product Owner Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | Requirements elicitation, user story creation, prioritization | +| **Responsibilities** | Client communication, requirements definition, acceptance criteria | +| **Interactions** | Client (primary), Business Analyst, Project Manager, Architect | +| **Deliverables** | PRDs, user stories, acceptance criteria, feature prioritization | +| **Autonomy Level** | High (client-facing, but requires approvals for major decisions) | + +#### 3.2.2 Project Manager Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | Backlog management, sprint planning, team coordination | +| **Responsibilities** | Sprint ceremonies, progress tracking, blocker resolution | +| **Interactions** | All agents, Client (status updates) | +| **Deliverables** | Sprint backlogs, burndown charts, status reports, meeting notes | +| **Autonomy Level** | High (operational decisions), Medium (scope changes) | + +#### 3.2.3 Business Analyst Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | Requirements analysis, process modeling, documentation | +| **Responsibilities** | Detailed analysis, workflow documentation, gap analysis | +| **Interactions** | Product Owner, Architect, Software Engineers | +| **Deliverables** | Business requirements docs, process flows, data dictionaries | +| **Autonomy Level** | Medium (analysis), Low (business rule changes) | + +#### 3.2.4 Software Architect Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | System design, technology selection, architectural patterns | +| **Responsibilities** | Architecture decisions, tech stack recommendations, ADRs | +| **Interactions** | Product Owner, Business Analyst, Software Engineers, DevOps | +| **Deliverables** | Architecture diagrams, ADRs, tech stack documentation, API designs | +| **Autonomy Level** | Medium (design decisions require client approval) | + +#### 3.2.5 Software Engineer Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | Code implementation, code review, technical problem-solving | +| **Responsibilities** | Feature implementation, bug fixes, code reviews, unit tests | +| **Interactions** | Architect, QA Engineers, other Software Engineers | +| **Deliverables** | Source code, unit tests, code documentation, PR descriptions | +| **Autonomy Level** | High (implementation), Low (architectural changes) | +| **Instance Support** | Multiple instances (e.g., Dave, Ellis, Kate) with specializations | + +#### 3.2.6 UI/UX Designer Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | User interface design, user experience, accessibility | +| **Responsibilities** | Wireframes, mockups, design systems, usability guidelines | +| **Interactions** | Product Owner, Software Engineers, QA Engineers | +| **Deliverables** | Wireframes, mockups, design tokens, accessibility specs | +| **Autonomy Level** | Medium (design choices require client feedback) | + +#### 3.2.7 QA Engineer Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | Test planning, test automation, quality assurance | +| **Responsibilities** | Test case creation, test execution, bug reporting, coverage analysis | +| **Interactions** | Software Engineers, Product Owner, DevOps | +| **Deliverables** | Test plans, test cases, bug reports, coverage reports | +| **Autonomy Level** | High (testing decisions), Medium (release sign-off) | + +#### 3.2.8 DevOps Engineer Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | CI/CD, infrastructure, deployment automation | +| **Responsibilities** | Pipeline setup, deployment scripts, monitoring, IaC | +| **Interactions** | Software Engineers, Architect, Security Expert | +| **Deliverables** | CI/CD pipelines, Dockerfiles, IaC configs, monitoring dashboards | +| **Autonomy Level** | Medium (infrastructure changes require approval) | + +#### 3.2.9 AI/ML Engineer Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | Machine learning, model training, ML operations | +| **Responsibilities** | ML model development, training pipelines, model deployment | +| **Interactions** | Software Engineers, Architect, DevOps | +| **Deliverables** | ML models, training scripts, evaluation reports, MLOps pipelines | +| **Autonomy Level** | Medium (model decisions require validation) | + +#### 3.2.10 Security Expert Agent + +| Attribute | Description | +|-----------|-------------| +| **Primary Expertise** | Security review, vulnerability assessment, compliance | +| **Responsibilities** | Security audits, penetration testing, compliance checks | +| **Interactions** | All technical agents, Architect | +| **Deliverables** | Security reports, vulnerability assessments, remediation plans | +| **Autonomy Level** | High (security recommendations), Low (risk acceptance) | + +### 3.3 Agent Configuration Model + +``` ++------------------+ spawns +-------------------+ +| Agent Type |---------------->| Agent Instance | ++------------------+ +-------------------+ +| - base_model | | - instance_id | +| - failover_model | | - name (e.g.Dave) | +| - expertise | | - project_id | +| - personality | | - domain_knowledge| +| - capabilities | | - conversation | ++------------------+ | - rag_context | + +-------------------+ +``` + +### 3.4 Stakeholder Communication Matrix + +| From/To | Client | PO | PM | BA | Arch | Eng | UX | QA | DevOps | AI/ML | Security | +|---------|--------|----|----|----|----|-----|----|----|--------|-------|----------| +| **Client** | - | Direct | Status | - | Review | - | Review | - | - | - | - | +| **PO** | Direct | - | Daily | Direct | Spike | Stories | Direct | Criteria | - | - | - | +| **PM** | Status | Daily | - | Tasks | Sync | Assign | Sync | Sync | Sync | Sync | Sync | +| **BA** | - | Direct | Tasks | - | Collab | Specs | Specs | Specs | - | - | - | +| **Arch** | Review | Spike | Sync | Collab | - | Guide | Consult | - | Direct | Direct | Direct | +| **Eng** | - | Stories | Status | Specs | Guide | PR | Impl | Bugs | Deploy | Collab | Review | +| **UX** | Review | Direct | Sync | Specs | Consult | Impl | - | Review | - | - | - | +| **QA** | - | Criteria | Sync | Specs | - | Bugs | Review | - | Test | - | Test | +| **DevOps** | - | - | Sync | - | Direct | Deploy | - | Test | - | MLOps | Infra | +| **AI/ML** | - | - | Sync | - | Direct | Collab | - | - | MLOps | - | Review | +| **Security** | - | - | Sync | - | Direct | Review | - | Test | Infra | Review | - | + +--- + +## 4. Functional Requirements + +### 4.1 Agent Management (FR-100 Series) + +#### FR-101: Agent Type Configuration + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-101 | +| **Title** | Agent Type Configuration | +| **Description** | System shall allow administrators to define agent types with configurable base models, failover models, expertise areas, and personality profiles | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | None | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-101.1: Admin can create new agent type with required fields (name, base_model, expertise) +- [ ] AC-101.2: Admin can specify failover model for each agent type +- [ ] AC-101.3: Admin can define expertise areas as searchable tags +- [ ] AC-101.4: Admin can configure personality profile (communication style, verbosity, tone) +- [ ] AC-101.5: System validates model availability before saving +- [ ] AC-101.6: Agent types can be activated/deactivated without deletion + +#### FR-102: Agent Instance Spawning + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-102 | +| **Title** | Agent Instance Spawning | +| **Description** | System shall spawn agent instances from defined types with unique identities and project assignments | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-101 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-102.1: System can spawn multiple instances from same agent type +- [ ] AC-102.2: Each instance has unique name (e.g., Dave, Ellis, Kate for Software Engineer) +- [ ] AC-102.3: Instances maintain separate conversation history +- [ ] AC-102.4: Instances can be assigned to specific projects +- [ ] AC-102.5: Instance count per type is configurable per project +- [ ] AC-102.6: Instances can be terminated and resources released + +#### FR-103: Agent Domain Knowledge (RAG) + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-103 | +| **Title** | Agent Domain Knowledge via RAG | +| **Description** | System shall support per-instance domain knowledge customization through RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-102, FR-801 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-103.1: Each instance can have unique RAG context loaded +- [ ] AC-103.2: Domain knowledge documents can be uploaded and indexed +- [ ] AC-103.3: RAG queries are scoped to project and agent +- [ ] AC-103.4: Knowledge base updates propagate to active instances +- [ ] AC-103.5: Instance can query shared project knowledge base +- [ ] AC-103.6: Query results include relevance scores and source attribution + +#### FR-104: Agent Communication + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-104 | +| **Title** | Inter-Agent Communication | +| **Description** | System shall enable structured communication between agent instances with message routing and history | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-102 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-104.1: Agents can send messages to specific agent instances +- [ ] AC-104.2: Agents can broadcast to all agents of a specific type +- [ ] AC-104.3: Messages are persisted with timestamps and metadata +- [ ] AC-104.4: Communication supports attachments (code, documents, artifacts) +- [ ] AC-104.5: Message threads are viewable by clients +- [ ] AC-104.6: Priority messaging for blockers and urgent items + +#### FR-105: Agent Monitoring + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-105 | +| **Title** | Agent Activity Monitoring | +| **Description** | System shall provide real-time visibility into agent activities, resource usage, and performance | +| **Priority** | Should Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-102 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-105.1: Dashboard shows active agents per project +- [ ] AC-105.2: Real-time activity feed for each agent instance +- [ ] AC-105.3: Token usage and cost tracking per agent +- [ ] AC-105.4: Performance metrics (response time, success rate) +- [ ] AC-105.5: Error logging and alerting for agent failures +- [ ] AC-105.6: Historical activity reports exportable + +### 4.2 Project Management (FR-200 Series) + +#### FR-201: Project Creation Wizard + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-201 | +| **Title** | Project Creation Wizard | +| **Description** | System shall guide users through project creation with complexity assessment and automatic workflow configuration | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | None | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-201.1: Wizard collects project name, description, and goals +- [ ] AC-201.2: Complexity assessment based on scope indicators +- [ ] AC-201.3: Four complexity levels supported: Script, Simple, Medium, Complex +- [ ] AC-201.4: Workflow automatically configured based on complexity +- [ ] AC-201.5: Client can override suggested complexity level +- [ ] AC-201.6: Project template selection for common project types + +**Complexity Level Definitions:** + +| Level | Git Repo | Sprints | Process | Agents | +|-------|----------|---------|---------|--------| +| **Script** | Optional | None | Minimal | 1-2 Engineers | +| **Simple** | Yes | 1 | Basic backlog | PO, PM, 2-3 Engineers, QA | +| **Medium** | Yes | 2-4 | Full AGILE | All roles | +| **Complex** | Yes | 5+ | Full AGILE + Architecture | All roles + specialists | + +#### FR-202: Project Configuration + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-202 | +| **Title** | Project Configuration | +| **Description** | System shall allow detailed project configuration including tech stack, integrations, and team composition | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-201 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-202.1: Tech stack selection with recommendations from Architect agent +- [ ] AC-202.2: Git provider configuration (Gitea/GitHub/GitLab) +- [ ] AC-202.3: Issue tracker selection (Gitea Issues/GitHub Issues/GitLab Issues) +- [ ] AC-202.4: CI/CD pipeline selection (Gitea Actions/GitHub Actions/GitLab CI) +- [ ] AC-202.5: Agent team composition customization +- [ ] AC-202.6: Autonomy level configuration +- [ ] AC-202.7: Notification preferences setup + +#### FR-203: Autonomy Level Configuration + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-203 | +| **Title** | Autonomy Level Configuration | +| **Description** | System shall support configurable autonomy levels determining when client approval is required | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-201 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-203.1: Three autonomy levels: FULL_CONTROL, MILESTONE, AUTONOMOUS +- [ ] AC-203.2: FULL_CONTROL requires approval for every significant action +- [ ] AC-203.3: MILESTONE requires approval at sprint boundaries and major decisions +- [ ] AC-203.4: AUTONOMOUS requires approval only for architecture and scope changes +- [ ] AC-203.5: Client can change autonomy level at any time +- [ ] AC-203.6: Client can intervene regardless of autonomy level + +**Autonomy Level Matrix:** + +| Action | FULL_CONTROL | MILESTONE | AUTONOMOUS | +|--------|--------------|-----------|------------| +| Requirements approval | Required | Required | Required | +| Architecture approval | Required | Required | Required | +| Sprint start | Required | Required | Auto | +| Story implementation | Required | Auto | Auto | +| PR merge | Required | Auto | Auto | +| Sprint completion | Required | Required | Auto | +| Bug fixes | Required | Auto | Auto | +| Documentation updates | Required | Auto | Auto | + +#### FR-204: Client Proficiency Modes + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-204 | +| **Title** | Client Proficiency Modes | +| **Description** | System shall support both technical and "auto" modes for clients with varying technical expertise | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-201 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-204.1: Technical mode allows detailed requirement specification +- [ ] AC-204.2: Auto mode accepts high-level goals ("just build it") +- [ ] AC-204.3: Auto mode triggers extended discovery process with PO agent +- [ ] AC-204.4: System adapts communication complexity to client mode +- [ ] AC-204.5: Client can switch modes mid-project +- [ ] AC-204.6: Technical details always available but optionally hidden in auto mode + +### 4.3 Workflow Management (FR-300 Series) + +#### FR-301: Requirements Discovery Workflow + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-301 | +| **Title** | Requirements Discovery Workflow | +| **Description** | System shall orchestrate a structured requirements discovery process between client and Product Owner agent | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-104, FR-201 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-301.1: PO agent initiates discovery conversation with client +- [ ] AC-301.2: System guides through problem statement, goals, constraints +- [ ] AC-301.3: PO agent generates user stories from conversation +- [ ] AC-301.4: Acceptance criteria auto-generated for each story +- [ ] AC-301.5: Requirements document generated and presented for approval +- [ ] AC-301.6: Iteration supported until client approves requirements + +#### FR-302: Architecture Spike Workflow + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-302 | +| **Title** | Architecture Spike Workflow | +| **Description** | System shall orchestrate collaborative architecture spike between PO, BA, and Architect agents | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-301 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-302.1: Spike triggered after requirements approval +- [ ] AC-302.2: PO, BA, and Architect collaborate on technical approach +- [ ] AC-302.3: Tech stack recommendations generated with rationale +- [ ] AC-302.4: Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) created +- [ ] AC-302.5: Risk assessment and mitigation strategies documented +- [ ] AC-302.6: Client approves tech stack and team composition + +#### FR-303: Sprint Planning Workflow + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-303 | +| **Title** | Sprint Planning Workflow | +| **Description** | System shall automate sprint planning with backlog grooming, estimation, and capacity planning | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-302, FR-401 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-303.1: PM agent creates sprint backlog from prioritized stories +- [ ] AC-303.2: Story point estimation using historical data +- [ ] AC-303.3: Capacity planning based on available agents +- [ ] AC-303.4: Dependencies identified and sequenced +- [ ] AC-303.5: Sprint goal defined and communicated +- [ ] AC-303.6: Sprint plan presented for client approval (if required by autonomy level) + +#### FR-304: Implementation Workflow + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-304 | +| **Title** | Implementation Workflow | +| **Description** | System shall orchestrate autonomous implementation with appropriate checkpoints | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-303 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-304.1: Engineer agents pick up stories from sprint backlog +- [ ] AC-304.2: Feature branches created automatically +- [ ] AC-304.3: Code implementation with unit tests +- [ ] AC-304.4: Code review by peer Engineer agent +- [ ] AC-304.5: QA agent performs testing +- [ ] AC-304.6: PR created and merged upon approval +- [ ] AC-304.7: Progress updates visible in real-time + +#### FR-305: Sprint Demo Workflow + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-305 | +| **Title** | Sprint Demo Workflow | +| **Description** | System shall generate sprint demo materials and facilitate client review | +| **Priority** | Should Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-304 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-305.1: Demo summary document generated +- [ ] AC-305.2: Completed stories listed with screenshots/recordings +- [ ] AC-305.3: Metrics presented (velocity, bug count, coverage) +- [ ] AC-305.4: Client feedback captured and converted to backlog items +- [ ] AC-305.5: Retrospective notes generated +- [ ] AC-305.6: Next sprint planning initiated + +### 4.4 Issue Tracking (FR-400 Series) + +#### FR-401: Issue Hierarchy + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-401 | +| **Title** | Issue Hierarchy (Epic/Story/Task) | +| **Description** | System shall support hierarchical issue structure with Epic, Story, and Task levels | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | None | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-401.1: Epics contain multiple Stories +- [ ] AC-401.2: Stories contain multiple Tasks +- [ ] AC-401.3: Bidirectional navigation between levels +- [ ] AC-401.4: Status aggregation (Epic shows % complete based on Stories) +- [ ] AC-401.5: Epic/Story/Task templates available +- [ ] AC-401.6: Bulk operations on hierarchies + +#### FR-402: External Issue Synchronization + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-402 | +| **Title** | External Issue Tracker Synchronization | +| **Description** | System shall mirror issues from external trackers while maintaining external tracker as source of truth | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-401, FR-802 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-402.1: Issues synced from Gitea/GitHub/GitLab Issues +- [ ] AC-402.2: Local mirror maintains external tracker fields +- [ ] AC-402.3: `remote_url` stored for navigation to external tracker +- [ ] AC-402.4: `sync_status` tracks synchronization state +- [ ] AC-402.5: `last_synced_at` timestamp maintained +- [ ] AC-402.6: Changes in Syndarix pushed back to external tracker +- [ ] AC-402.7: Conflict resolution favors external tracker +- [ ] AC-402.8: Webhook-based real-time sync supported + +#### FR-403: Issue CRUD Operations + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-403 | +| **Title** | Issue CRUD Operations | +| **Description** | System shall provide complete CRUD operations for issues with audit trail | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-401 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-403.1: Create issues with title, description, type, priority +- [ ] AC-403.2: Read issues with filtering, sorting, search +- [ ] AC-403.3: Update issues with change tracking +- [ ] AC-403.4: Delete issues with soft delete and recovery +- [ ] AC-403.5: Assign issues to agent instances +- [ ] AC-403.6: Label and milestone management +- [ ] AC-403.7: Due date and estimation fields +- [ ] AC-403.8: Full audit trail for all changes + +#### FR-404: Issue Comments and Activity + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-404 | +| **Title** | Issue Comments and Activity | +| **Description** | System shall track all issue activity including comments, status changes, and agent actions | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-403 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-404.1: Comments support markdown formatting +- [ ] AC-404.2: Agent comments attributed to specific instance +- [ ] AC-404.3: Activity feed shows all changes chronologically +- [ ] AC-404.4: @mentions notify relevant agents or client +- [ ] AC-404.5: Comments synced with external tracker +- [ ] AC-404.6: File attachments supported in comments + +### 4.5 Git Integration (FR-500 Series) + +#### FR-501: Repository Management + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-501 | +| **Title** | Git Repository Management | +| **Description** | System shall manage Git repositories across supported providers (Gitea, GitHub, GitLab) | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-802 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-501.1: Create new repositories on connected provider +- [ ] AC-501.2: Clone existing repositories for projects +- [ ] AC-501.3: Configure branch protection rules +- [ ] AC-501.4: Manage repository settings (description, visibility) +- [ ] AC-501.5: Support private and public repositories +- [ ] AC-501.6: Repository health monitoring + +#### FR-502: Branch Management + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-502 | +| **Title** | Git Branch Management | +| **Description** | System shall automate branch creation, merging, and cleanup following GitFlow or trunk-based patterns | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-501 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-502.1: Feature branches created automatically for stories +- [ ] AC-502.2: Branch naming convention enforced (e.g., `feature/STORY-123-description`) +- [ ] AC-502.3: Automatic rebasing on conflict-free merges +- [ ] AC-502.4: Branch cleanup after merge +- [ ] AC-502.5: Protected branch enforcement +- [ ] AC-502.6: GitFlow and trunk-based development supported + +#### FR-503: Pull Request Management + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-503 | +| **Title** | Pull Request Management | +| **Description** | System shall create, review, and merge pull requests with automated workflows | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-502 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-503.1: PR created automatically upon story completion +- [ ] AC-503.2: PR description generated from commit messages and story +- [ ] AC-503.3: Automated code review by Engineer agent +- [ ] AC-503.4: Review comments posted to PR +- [ ] AC-503.5: CI status integrated into merge decision +- [ ] AC-503.6: Squash merge with conventional commit message +- [ ] AC-503.7: PR linked to issue for traceability + +#### FR-504: Commit Management + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-504 | +| **Title** | Commit Management | +| **Description** | System shall enforce commit conventions and maintain clean git history | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-502 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-504.1: Conventional commit format enforced +- [ ] AC-504.2: Commit messages include issue reference +- [ ] AC-504.3: Atomic commits (one logical change per commit) +- [ ] AC-504.4: GPG signing supported +- [ ] AC-504.5: Commit author set to agent instance identity +- [ ] AC-504.6: Commit history viewable per story/feature + +### 4.6 CI/CD Integration (FR-600 Series) + +#### FR-601: Pipeline Configuration + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-601 | +| **Title** | CI/CD Pipeline Configuration | +| **Description** | System shall configure and manage CI/CD pipelines across supported providers | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-501, FR-803 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-601.1: Pipeline templates for common tech stacks +- [ ] AC-601.2: Support for Gitea Actions, GitHub Actions, GitLab CI +- [ ] AC-601.3: Pipeline configuration generated by DevOps agent +- [ ] AC-601.4: Environment-specific configurations (dev, staging, prod) +- [ ] AC-601.5: Secret management integration +- [ ] AC-601.6: Manual approval gates supported + +#### FR-602: Pipeline Execution Monitoring + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-602 | +| **Title** | Pipeline Execution Monitoring | +| **Description** | System shall monitor pipeline executions and surface results to agents | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-601 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-602.1: Real-time pipeline status updates +- [ ] AC-602.2: Build logs accessible to agents +- [ ] AC-602.3: Test results parsed and displayed +- [ ] AC-602.4: Coverage reports integrated +- [ ] AC-602.5: Failure notifications trigger agent response +- [ ] AC-602.6: Deployment status tracking + +### 4.7 Artifact Delivery (FR-700 Series) + +#### FR-701: Code Artifact Delivery + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-701 | +| **Title** | Code Artifact Delivery | +| **Description** | System shall deliver complete source code with proper structure and documentation | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-501 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-701.1: Full source code delivered via Git repository +- [ ] AC-701.2: README with setup instructions generated +- [ ] AC-701.3: Code follows agreed style guide +- [ ] AC-701.4: All dependencies documented (requirements.txt, package.json, etc.) +- [ ] AC-701.5: Environment configuration templates provided +- [ ] AC-701.6: Build and run scripts included + +#### FR-702: Documentation Artifact Delivery + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-702 | +| **Title** | Documentation Artifact Delivery | +| **Description** | System shall deliver comprehensive documentation including technical docs, ADRs, and user guides | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-302 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-702.1: Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) delivered +- [ ] AC-702.2: API documentation (OpenAPI/Swagger) generated +- [ ] AC-702.3: Data model documentation provided +- [ ] AC-702.4: Deployment guide included +- [ ] AC-702.5: User documentation generated (if applicable) +- [ ] AC-702.6: Changelog maintained and delivered + +#### FR-703: Test Artifact Delivery + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | FR-703 | +| **Title** | Test Artifact Delivery | +| **Description** | System shall deliver complete test suite with coverage reports | +| **Priority** | Must Have | +| **Dependencies** | FR-304 | + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] AC-703.1: Unit tests delivered with source code +- [ ] AC-703.2: Integration tests included +- [ ] AC-703.3: E2E tests provided (if applicable) +- [ ] AC-703.4: Test coverage report generated +- [ ] AC-703.5: Test documentation (how to run, what's covered) +- [ ] AC-703.6: Performance test results (if applicable) + +--- + +## 5. Non-Functional Requirements + +### 5.1 Performance Requirements (NFR-100 Series) + +#### NFR-101: Response Time + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-101 | +| **Description** | API response times under normal load | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Targets:** +- API endpoints: < 200ms (95th percentile) +- Agent message routing: < 500ms +- Search queries: < 1 second +- File uploads (< 10MB): < 5 seconds +- Dashboard load: < 2 seconds + +#### NFR-102: Throughput + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-102 | +| **Description** | System throughput capacity | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Targets:** +- Concurrent active projects: 10+ +- Concurrent active agents: 50+ +- API requests per second: 100+ +- WebSocket connections: 200+ +- Background jobs per minute: 500+ + +#### NFR-103: Agent Response Time + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-103 | +| **Description** | AI agent response latency | +| **Priority** | Should Have | + +**Targets:** +- Simple queries: < 10 seconds +- Code generation: < 60 seconds +- Complex analysis: < 120 seconds +- Failover to backup model: < 5 seconds + +### 5.2 Scalability Requirements (NFR-200 Series) + +#### NFR-201: Horizontal Scalability + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-201 | +| **Description** | System horizontal scaling capability | +| **Priority** | Should Have | + +**Targets:** +- Web servers: Auto-scale 1-10 instances +- Worker processes: Auto-scale 2-20 instances +- Database: Read replicas supported +- Cache: Redis cluster supported + +#### NFR-202: Data Scalability + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-202 | +| **Description** | Data growth handling | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Targets:** +- Projects: 1000+ per instance +- Issues: 100,000+ total +- Knowledge base documents: 10,000+ per project +- Conversation history: Unlimited with archival +- File storage: 1TB+ with object storage + +### 5.3 Security Requirements (NFR-300 Series) + +#### NFR-301: Authentication + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-301 | +| **Description** | Authentication mechanisms | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Requirements:** +- JWT-based authentication (access + refresh tokens) +- OAuth 2.0 provider mode for MCP integration +- Session management with device tracking +- Multi-factor authentication (future) +- SSO/SAML support (future) + +#### NFR-302: Authorization + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-302 | +| **Description** | Authorization and access control | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Requirements:** +- Role-based access control (RBAC) +- Project-level permissions +- Resource ownership validation +- API key scoping for integrations +- Audit logging for all sensitive actions + +#### NFR-303: Data Protection + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-303 | +| **Description** | Data encryption and protection | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Requirements:** +- TLS 1.3 for all communications +- Database encryption at rest +- Secrets management (never in code) +- PII handling compliance +- Data retention policies + +#### NFR-304: API Security + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-304 | +| **Description** | API security measures | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Requirements:** +- Rate limiting (60/min default, 10/min for auth) +- CORS configuration +- CSRF protection +- Input validation +- SQL injection prevention +- Security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) + +### 5.4 Reliability Requirements (NFR-400 Series) + +#### NFR-401: Availability + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-401 | +| **Description** | System availability targets | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Targets:** +- Uptime: 99.5% (monthly) +- Planned maintenance: < 4 hours/month +- Unplanned downtime: < 2 hours/month +- Recovery time objective (RTO): < 1 hour +- Recovery point objective (RPO): < 15 minutes + +#### NFR-402: Fault Tolerance + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-402 | +| **Description** | Fault tolerance mechanisms | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Requirements:** +- Agent model failover on primary failure +- Database connection pooling with retry +- Message queue persistence +- Graceful degradation on external service failure +- Circuit breaker patterns for integrations + +#### NFR-403: Data Durability + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-403 | +| **Description** | Data durability guarantees | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Requirements:** +- Database backups: Daily with 30-day retention +- Point-in-time recovery: 7 days +- Transaction logging: Enabled +- Replication: Synchronous for critical data +- Backup verification: Weekly automated tests + +### 5.5 Usability Requirements (NFR-500 Series) + +#### NFR-501: User Interface + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-501 | +| **Description** | User interface requirements | +| **Priority** | Should Have | + +**Requirements:** +- Responsive design (desktop, tablet, mobile) +- Dark mode support +- Keyboard navigation +- Loading indicators for async operations +- Error messages are actionable +- Consistent design system (shadcn/ui) + +#### NFR-502: Accessibility + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-502 | +| **Description** | Accessibility compliance | +| **Priority** | Should Have | + +**Requirements:** +- WCAG 2.1 AA compliance +- Screen reader support +- Color contrast requirements +- Focus management +- Alt text for images + +#### NFR-503: Internationalization + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-503 | +| **Description** | Multi-language support | +| **Priority** | Could Have | + +**Requirements:** +- English (primary) +- Italian (inherited from PragmaStack) +- Locale-aware date/time/number formatting +- RTL support (future consideration) + +### 5.6 Maintainability Requirements (NFR-600 Series) + +#### NFR-601: Code Quality + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-601 | +| **Description** | Code quality standards | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Requirements:** +- Test coverage: > 80% +- Type coverage: 100% (TypeScript, Python type hints) +- Linting: Zero errors (ESLint, Ruff) +- Documentation: All public APIs documented +- Code review: Required for all changes + +#### NFR-602: Logging and Monitoring + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-602 | +| **Description** | Observability requirements | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Requirements:** +- Structured logging (JSON format) +- Log levels: DEBUG, INFO, WARNING, ERROR, CRITICAL +- Correlation IDs for request tracing +- Metrics collection (Prometheus format) +- Alerting on critical errors + +#### NFR-603: Deployment + +| Attribute | Value | +|-----------|-------| +| **ID** | NFR-603 | +| **Description** | Deployment requirements | +| **Priority** | Must Have | + +**Requirements:** +- Docker containerization +- Docker Compose for local development +- Environment-based configuration +- Blue-green deployment support +- Rollback capability +- Database migration automation + +--- + +## 6. System Architecture Overview + +### 6.1 High-Level Architecture + +``` ++==============================================================================+ +| CLIENT LAYER | ++==============================================================================+ +| +-------------------+ +-------------------+ +-------------------+ | +| | Web Client | | Chat Interface | | Admin Console | | +| | (Next.js 16) | | (WebSocket/SSE) | | | | +| +-------------------+ +-------------------+ +-------------------+ | ++==============================================================================+ + | + | HTTPS / WSS + v ++==============================================================================+ +| API GATEWAY | ++==============================================================================+ +| +-------------------+ +-------------------+ +-------------------+ | +| | Authentication | | Rate Limiting | | Load Balancer | | +| +-------------------+ +-------------------+ +-------------------+ | ++==============================================================================+ + | + v ++==============================================================================+ +| SYNDARIX CORE | ++==============================================================================+ +| +------------------+ +------------------+ +------------------+ | +| | Agent | | Project | | Workflow | | +| | Orchestrator | | Manager | | Engine | | +| +------------------+ +------------------+ +------------------+ | +| | | | | +| +--------v--------------------v---------------------v--------+ | +| | FastAPI Backend | | +| | +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ | | +| | | API | | Services | | CRUD | | | +| | | Routes | | Layer | | Layer | | | +| | +------------+ +------------+ +------------+ | | +| +------------------------------------------------------------+ | ++==============================================================================+ + | + v ++==============================================================================+ +| MCP ORCHESTRATION LAYER | +| All integrations via unified MCP servers with project scoping | ++==============================================================================+ +| +-------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ | +| | LLM | | Git | | Knowledge | | File | | +| | Gateway | | MCP | | Base MCP | | System MCP | | +| +-------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ | +| +-------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ | +| | Code | | Issues | | CI/CD | | Search | | +| | Analysis MCP| | MCP | | MCP | | MCP | | +| +-------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ +-------------+ | ++==============================================================================+ + | + +---------------+---------------+ + | | | + v v v ++===============+ +===============+ +===============================+ +| PostgreSQL | | Redis | | External Services | +| + pgvector | | (Cache/Queue) | | (LLM APIs, Git, CI/CD, etc.) | ++===============+ +===============+ +===============================+ +``` + +### 6.2 Component Details + +#### 6.2.1 Agent Orchestrator + +**Purpose:** Manages agent lifecycle, spawning, communication, and coordination + +**Responsibilities:** +- Spawn agent instances from type definitions +- Route messages between agents +- Manage agent context and memory +- Handle agent failover +- Track agent resource usage + +**Key Interfaces:** +```python +class AgentOrchestrator: + def spawn_agent(agent_type_id: UUID, project_id: UUID, name: str) -> AgentInstance + def terminate_agent(instance_id: UUID) -> None + def send_message(from_id: UUID, to_id: UUID, message: AgentMessage) -> None + def broadcast(from_id: UUID, target_type: AgentType, message: AgentMessage) -> None + def get_agent_status(instance_id: UUID) -> AgentStatus +``` + +#### 6.2.2 Project Manager (Component) + +**Purpose:** Manages project lifecycle, configuration, and state + +**Responsibilities:** +- Create and configure projects +- Track project status and progress +- Manage project settings and integrations +- Generate project reports + +**Key Interfaces:** +```python +class ProjectManager: + def create_project(config: ProjectConfig) -> Project + def configure_project(project_id: UUID, settings: ProjectSettings) -> None + def get_project_status(project_id: UUID) -> ProjectStatus + def archive_project(project_id: UUID) -> None +``` + +#### 6.2.3 Workflow Engine + +**Purpose:** Orchestrates multi-step workflows and agent collaboration + +**Responsibilities:** +- Define and execute workflow templates +- Track workflow state and progress +- Handle workflow branching and conditions +- Manage approval gates + +**Key Interfaces:** +```python +class WorkflowEngine: + def start_workflow(workflow_type: WorkflowType, project_id: UUID) -> WorkflowInstance + def advance_workflow(instance_id: UUID, input: WorkflowInput) -> WorkflowState + def pause_workflow(instance_id: UUID) -> None + def resume_workflow(instance_id: UUID) -> None +``` + +### 6.3 MCP Architecture + +#### 6.3.1 Unified Singleton Pattern + +**Decision:** ALL MCP servers are unified singletons with project_id/agent_id scoping. No per-project server spawning. + +**Rationale:** +- Per-project servers too resource-heavy +- Unified servers enable cross-project learning +- Simpler deployment and management +- Consistent tool interface + +**Implementation:** +```python +# All MCP tools accept explicit scope parameters +@mcp_tool +def search_knowledge( + project_id: str, + agent_id: str, + query: str, + scope: Literal["project", "global"] = "project" +) -> SearchResults: + """Search knowledge base with explicit scoping""" + pass + +@mcp_tool +def create_issue( + project_id: str, + agent_id: str, + title: str, + description: str, + issue_type: IssueType +) -> Issue: + """Create issue in project-scoped context""" + pass +``` + +#### 6.3.2 MCP Server Registry + +| MCP Server | Purpose | Scope Parameters | +|------------|---------|------------------| +| **LLM Gateway** | Route LLM requests with failover | agent_id, model_preference | +| **Git MCP** | Git operations | project_id, repo_id | +| **Knowledge Base MCP** | RAG and document search | project_id, agent_id | +| **File System MCP** | File operations | project_id, workspace_path | +| **Code Analysis MCP** | Static analysis, linting | project_id, file_path | +| **Issues MCP** | Issue tracking operations | project_id, issue_id | +| **CI/CD MCP** | Pipeline operations | project_id, pipeline_id | +| **Search MCP** | Full-text search | project_id, search_scope | + +### 6.4 Data Flow Diagrams + +#### 6.4.1 Requirements Discovery Flow + +``` ++--------+ 1. Describe Idea +----------+ +| Client |----------------------->| PO | ++--------+ | Agent | + ^ +----------+ + | | + | 2. Clarifying + | Questions + | | + | 6. Approve v + | Requirements +----------+ + | |Discovery | + +---------------------------|Workflow | + +----------+ + | + 3. Generate + Stories + | + v + +----------+ + | BA | + | Agent | + +----------+ + | + 4. Detailed + Analysis + | + v + +----------+ + |Requirements| + | Document | + +----------+ + | + 5. Present + to Client + | + v + +--------+ + | Client | + +--------+ +``` + +#### 6.4.2 Implementation Flow + +``` ++-------+ 1. Pick +----------+ 2. Create +----------+ +|Sprint | Story |Engineer | Branch | Git | +|Backlog|------------->| Agent |--------------->| MCP | ++-------+ +----------+ +----------+ + | | + 3. Implement 4. Commit + | Changes + v | + +----------+ | + | Code |<---------------------+ + +----------+ + | + 5. Create + PR + v + +----------+ 6. Review +----------+ + | Git |--------------->| Engineer | + | MCP | | (Peer) | + +----------+ +----------+ + | | + | 7. Approve + v | + +----------+ 8. Test +----------+ + | QA |<---------------| Pipeline | + | Agent | | MCP | + +----------+ +----------+ + | + 9. Merge + | + v + +----------+ + | Main | + | Branch | + +----------+ +``` + +--- + +## 7. Data Requirements + +### 7.1 Entity Definitions + +#### 7.1.1 Core Entities + +##### User + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| email | String(255) | Unique, Not Null | User email address | +| hashed_password | String(255) | Not Null | Bcrypt hashed password | +| full_name | String(100) | Nullable | Display name | +| is_active | Boolean | Default: true | Account status | +| is_superuser | Boolean | Default: false | Admin privileges | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| updated_at | DateTime | Nullable | Last update timestamp | +| deleted_at | DateTime | Nullable | Soft delete timestamp | + +##### Project + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| name | String(100) | Not Null | Project name | +| description | Text | Nullable | Project description | +| complexity | Enum | Not Null | Script/Simple/Medium/Complex | +| status | Enum | Not Null | Active/Paused/Completed/Archived | +| autonomy_level | Enum | Not Null | FULL_CONTROL/MILESTONE/AUTONOMOUS | +| client_mode | Enum | Not Null | Technical/Auto | +| owner_id | UUID | FK -> User | Project owner | +| settings | JSONB | Not Null | Project configuration | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| updated_at | DateTime | Nullable | Last update timestamp | + +##### AgentType + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| name | String(50) | Unique, Not Null | Type name | +| role | Enum | Not Null | PO/PM/BA/Architect/Engineer/etc. | +| base_model | String(100) | Not Null | Primary LLM model identifier | +| failover_model | String(100) | Nullable | Backup LLM model | +| expertise | String[] | Not Null | Expertise tags | +| personality | JSONB | Not Null | Personality configuration | +| capabilities | String[] | Not Null | Available capabilities | +| system_prompt | Text | Not Null | Base system prompt | +| is_active | Boolean | Default: true | Type availability | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| updated_at | DateTime | Nullable | Last update timestamp | + +##### AgentInstance + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| name | String(50) | Not Null | Instance name (e.g., "Dave") | +| agent_type_id | UUID | FK -> AgentType | Parent type | +| project_id | UUID | FK -> Project | Assigned project | +| status | Enum | Not Null | Active/Idle/Terminated | +| context | JSONB | Not Null | Current context state | +| conversation_id | UUID | Nullable | Current conversation | +| rag_collection_id | String(100) | Nullable | Domain knowledge collection | +| token_usage | JSONB | Not Null | Token consumption stats | +| last_active_at | DateTime | Nullable | Last activity timestamp | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| terminated_at | DateTime | Nullable | Termination timestamp | + +#### 7.1.2 Issue Tracking Entities + +##### Issue + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| project_id | UUID | FK -> Project | Parent project | +| parent_id | UUID | FK -> Issue | Parent issue (for hierarchy) | +| type | Enum | Not Null | Epic/Story/Task/Bug | +| title | String(200) | Not Null | Issue title | +| description | Text | Nullable | Issue description (markdown) | +| status | Enum | Not Null | Open/InProgress/Review/Done/Closed | +| priority | Enum | Not Null | Critical/High/Medium/Low | +| story_points | Integer | Nullable | Estimation | +| assignee_id | UUID | FK -> AgentInstance | Assigned agent | +| reporter_id | UUID | FK -> User/AgentInstance | Creator | +| sprint_id | UUID | FK -> Sprint | Current sprint | +| milestone_id | UUID | FK -> Milestone | Target milestone | +| labels | String[] | Not Null | Issue labels | +| due_date | Date | Nullable | Due date | +| **external_tracker_type** | Enum | Nullable | Gitea/GitHub/GitLab | +| **external_issue_id** | String(100) | Nullable | External system ID | +| **external_issue_number** | Integer | Nullable | External issue number | +| **remote_url** | String(500) | Nullable | URL to external issue | +| **sync_status** | Enum | Not Null | Synced/Pending/Conflict/Error | +| **last_synced_at** | DateTime | Nullable | Last sync timestamp | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| updated_at | DateTime | Nullable | Last update timestamp | +| closed_at | DateTime | Nullable | Closure timestamp | + +##### IssueComment + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| issue_id | UUID | FK -> Issue | Parent issue | +| author_id | UUID | FK -> User/AgentInstance | Comment author | +| author_type | Enum | Not Null | User/Agent | +| body | Text | Not Null | Comment content (markdown) | +| external_comment_id | String(100) | Nullable | External system ID | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| updated_at | DateTime | Nullable | Last update timestamp | + +##### Sprint + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| project_id | UUID | FK -> Project | Parent project | +| name | String(100) | Not Null | Sprint name | +| goal | Text | Nullable | Sprint goal | +| number | Integer | Not Null | Sprint sequence number | +| status | Enum | Not Null | Planning/Active/Review/Completed | +| start_date | Date | Nullable | Sprint start | +| end_date | Date | Nullable | Sprint end | +| velocity | Integer | Nullable | Completed story points | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| completed_at | DateTime | Nullable | Completion timestamp | + +#### 7.1.3 Git Integration Entities + +##### Repository + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| project_id | UUID | FK -> Project | Parent project | +| provider | Enum | Not Null | Gitea/GitHub/GitLab | +| provider_repo_id | String(100) | Not Null | Provider's repository ID | +| name | String(100) | Not Null | Repository name | +| full_name | String(200) | Not Null | Owner/repo format | +| clone_url | String(500) | Not Null | HTTPS clone URL | +| ssh_url | String(500) | Nullable | SSH clone URL | +| default_branch | String(100) | Not Null | Default branch name | +| is_private | Boolean | Not Null | Visibility | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | + +##### PullRequest + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| repository_id | UUID | FK -> Repository | Parent repository | +| provider_pr_id | String(100) | Not Null | Provider's PR ID | +| number | Integer | Not Null | PR number | +| title | String(200) | Not Null | PR title | +| description | Text | Nullable | PR description | +| status | Enum | Not Null | Open/Merged/Closed | +| source_branch | String(100) | Not Null | Source branch | +| target_branch | String(100) | Not Null | Target branch | +| author_id | UUID | FK -> AgentInstance | PR author | +| issue_id | UUID | FK -> Issue | Linked issue | +| remote_url | String(500) | Not Null | URL to PR | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| merged_at | DateTime | Nullable | Merge timestamp | + +#### 7.1.4 Knowledge Base Entities + +##### KnowledgeDocument + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| project_id | UUID | FK -> Project | Parent project (null for global) | +| collection_id | String(100) | Not Null | Vector store collection | +| title | String(200) | Not Null | Document title | +| content | Text | Not Null | Document content | +| content_type | Enum | Not Null | Markdown/Code/ADR/API/etc. | +| source_url | String(500) | Nullable | Original source | +| metadata | JSONB | Not Null | Additional metadata | +| embedding_id | String(100) | Not Null | Vector store ID | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| updated_at | DateTime | Nullable | Last update timestamp | + +##### Conversation + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| project_id | UUID | FK -> Project | Parent project | +| participants | UUID[] | Not Null | Agent/User IDs | +| topic | String(200) | Nullable | Conversation topic | +| status | Enum | Not Null | Active/Archived | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | +| last_message_at | DateTime | Nullable | Last activity | + +##### Message + +| Field | Type | Constraints | Description | +|-------|------|-------------|-------------| +| id | UUID | PK | Unique identifier | +| conversation_id | UUID | FK -> Conversation | Parent conversation | +| sender_id | UUID | FK -> User/AgentInstance | Message sender | +| sender_type | Enum | Not Null | User/Agent | +| content | Text | Not Null | Message content | +| message_type | Enum | Not Null | Text/Code/Attachment/Action | +| metadata | JSONB | Not Null | Additional data | +| created_at | DateTime | Not Null | Creation timestamp | + +### 7.2 Entity Relationship Diagram + +``` ++-------------+ +----------------+ +---------------+ +| User |1-----*| Project |1-----*| Sprint | ++-------------+ +----------------+ +---------------+ + |1 |1 + | | + |* |* + +------+------+ +------+------+ + | | | | + +------v------+ +----v----+ | +-----v-----+ + |AgentInstance| |Repository| | | Issue | + +-------------+ +----------+ | +-----------+ + |1 |1 | |1 + | | | | + |* |* | |* + +------v------+ +----v----+ | +-----v-----+ + | Message | | PR |----+ |IssueComment| + +-------------+ +---------+ +-----------+ + ^ + |* + +------+------+ + | Conversation| + +-------------+ + ^ + |1 + +------+------+ + | Project | + +-------------+ +``` + +### 7.3 Data Migration Strategy + +1. **Schema Migrations:** Alembic with versioned migrations +2. **Data Migrations:** Separate migration scripts for data transformations +3. **Rollback Support:** Each migration includes downgrade path +4. **Zero-Downtime:** Migrations designed for online application + +--- + +## 8. Integration Requirements + +### 8.1 MCP Integration Architecture + +All integrations follow the MCP-first pattern with unified singleton servers. + +#### 8.1.1 LLM Gateway MCP + +**Purpose:** Route LLM requests with model selection and failover + +| Tool | Description | Parameters | +|------|-------------|------------| +| `chat_completion` | Generate chat completion | agent_id, messages, model_preference | +| `embedding` | Generate embeddings | text, model | +| `model_status` | Check model availability | model_id | + +**Failover Logic:** +1. Attempt primary model (from agent type config) +2. On failure, switch to failover model +3. Log failover event for monitoring +4. Notify system admin on repeated failures + +#### 8.1.2 Git MCP + +**Purpose:** Git operations across providers (Gitea, GitHub, GitLab) + +**Provider Priority:** Gitea first, then GitHub, then GitLab + +| Tool | Description | Parameters | +|------|-------------|------------| +| `create_repository` | Create new repo | project_id, name, description, private | +| `clone_repository` | Clone existing repo | project_id, url | +| `create_branch` | Create feature branch | project_id, repo_id, branch_name, source | +| `commit_changes` | Commit file changes | project_id, repo_id, branch, files, message | +| `create_pr` | Create pull request | project_id, repo_id, source, target, title, body | +| `merge_pr` | Merge pull request | project_id, repo_id, pr_number, strategy | +| `get_diff` | Get branch diff | project_id, repo_id, base, head | +| `list_branches` | List repository branches | project_id, repo_id | + +#### 8.1.3 Issues MCP + +**Purpose:** Issue tracking operations with external sync + +**Provider Priority:** Gitea Issues first, then GitHub Issues, then GitLab Issues + +| Tool | Description | Parameters | +|------|-------------|------------| +| `create_issue` | Create new issue | project_id, title, body, type, priority | +| `update_issue` | Update issue fields | project_id, issue_id, fields | +| `add_comment` | Add issue comment | project_id, issue_id, body | +| `sync_from_external` | Pull external changes | project_id, issue_id | +| `push_to_external` | Push local changes | project_id, issue_id | +| `link_to_pr` | Link issue to PR | project_id, issue_id, pr_id | + +#### 8.1.4 CI/CD MCP + +**Purpose:** Pipeline configuration and monitoring + +**Provider Priority:** Gitea Actions first, then GitHub Actions, then GitLab CI + +| Tool | Description | Parameters | +|------|-------------|------------| +| `create_pipeline` | Create pipeline config | project_id, repo_id, template | +| `trigger_pipeline` | Start pipeline run | project_id, repo_id, branch | +| `get_pipeline_status` | Get run status | project_id, repo_id, run_id | +| `get_pipeline_logs` | Get execution logs | project_id, repo_id, run_id, job | +| `cancel_pipeline` | Cancel running pipeline | project_id, repo_id, run_id | + +#### 8.1.5 Knowledge Base MCP + +**Purpose:** RAG operations for agent context + +| Tool | Description | Parameters | +|------|-------------|------------| +| `index_document` | Add document to KB | project_id, agent_id, content, metadata | +| `search_knowledge` | Semantic search | project_id, agent_id, query, scope, limit | +| `update_document` | Update indexed doc | project_id, document_id, content | +| `delete_document` | Remove from index | project_id, document_id | +| `list_collections` | List available collections | project_id | + +#### 8.1.6 File System MCP + +**Purpose:** Workspace file operations + +| Tool | Description | Parameters | +|------|-------------|------------| +| `read_file` | Read file content | project_id, path | +| `write_file` | Write file content | project_id, path, content | +| `list_directory` | List directory contents | project_id, path | +| `create_directory` | Create directory | project_id, path | +| `delete_path` | Delete file/directory | project_id, path | +| `search_files` | Search by pattern | project_id, pattern, scope | + +#### 8.1.7 Code Analysis MCP + +**Purpose:** Static analysis and code intelligence + +| Tool | Description | Parameters | +|------|-------------|------------| +| `analyze_file` | Static analysis | project_id, path | +| `lint_file` | Run linter | project_id, path, config | +| `format_file` | Auto-format | project_id, path | +| `get_symbols` | Extract symbols | project_id, path | +| `find_references` | Find symbol references | project_id, symbol | +| `get_complexity` | Calculate complexity | project_id, path | + +### 8.2 External Service Integrations + +#### 8.2.1 LLM Providers + +| Provider | Models | Use Cases | +|----------|--------|-----------| +| **Anthropic** | Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Claude 3 Opus | Primary agents, complex reasoning | +| **OpenAI** | GPT-4, GPT-4 Turbo | Failover, specific tasks | +| **Local** | Llama 3, Mistral | Cost optimization, privacy | + +#### 8.2.2 Git Providers + +| Provider | Priority | Features | +|----------|----------|----------| +| **Gitea** | 1st | Self-hosted, full control | +| **GitHub** | 2nd | Popular, extensive ecosystem | +| **GitLab** | 3rd | DevOps integration | + +#### 8.2.3 Authentication Providers + +| Provider | Protocol | Use Case | +|----------|----------|----------| +| **Internal** | JWT | Primary authentication | +| **OAuth Provider** | OAuth 2.0 | MCP client authentication | +| **Google** | OAuth 2.0 | Social login (optional) | +| **GitHub** | OAuth 2.0 | Social login (optional) | + +### 8.3 Integration Configuration + +```yaml +# Example integration configuration +integrations: + llm: + primary: + provider: anthropic + model: claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 + api_key: ${ANTHROPIC_API_KEY} + failover: + provider: openai + model: gpt-4-turbo + api_key: ${OPENAI_API_KEY} + + git: + provider: gitea + base_url: https://gitea.example.com + token: ${GITEA_TOKEN} + + issues: + provider: gitea # Uses same provider as git + sync_interval: 60 # seconds + + cicd: + provider: gitea_actions + # Inherits git provider config + +mcp: + servers: + llm_gateway: + port: 9001 + singleton: true + git_mcp: + port: 9002 + singleton: true + issues_mcp: + port: 9003 + singleton: true + knowledge_base_mcp: + port: 9004 + singleton: true + file_system_mcp: + port: 9005 + singleton: true + code_analysis_mcp: + port: 9006 + singleton: true + cicd_mcp: + port: 9007 + singleton: true +``` + +--- + +## 9. User Stories and Use Cases + +### 9.1 Epic: Project Initialization + +#### US-001: Create New Project (Technical Client) + +**As a** technical client +**I want to** create a new project with detailed specifications +**So that** I can get exactly the software I need built + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Can specify project name and description +- [ ] Can select complexity level manually +- [ ] Can configure tech stack preferences +- [ ] Can set autonomy level +- [ ] Can select Git provider and repository settings +- [ ] Can customize agent team composition +- [ ] Receive confirmation with project dashboard link + +**Story Points:** 5 + +#### US-002: Create New Project (Auto Mode) + +**As a** non-technical client +**I want to** describe my idea in plain language +**So that** AI agents can figure out the details + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Can describe idea in natural language +- [ ] PO agent asks clarifying questions +- [ ] System suggests complexity and tech stack +- [ ] Can approve or request changes to suggestions +- [ ] Project created with recommended settings + +**Story Points:** 8 + +### 9.2 Epic: Requirements Management + +#### US-003: Define Requirements + +**As a** client +**I want to** work with the PO agent to define requirements +**So that** the development team knows what to build + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] PO agent initiates discovery conversation +- [ ] Can describe features and goals +- [ ] PO generates user stories from conversation +- [ ] Can review and edit generated stories +- [ ] Can approve final requirements document + +**Story Points:** 8 + +#### US-004: View Requirements Document + +**As a** client +**I want to** view the generated requirements document +**So that** I can review what will be built + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Document includes all user stories +- [ ] Each story has acceptance criteria +- [ ] Stories are prioritized +- [ ] Document exportable as PDF/Markdown +- [ ] Version history available + +**Story Points:** 3 + +### 9.3 Epic: Development Workflow + +#### US-005: Review Architecture Proposal + +**As a** client +**I want to** review the architecture proposal +**So that** I can approve technical decisions + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Proposal includes tech stack with rationale +- [ ] Architecture diagrams provided +- [ ] ADRs explain key decisions +- [ ] Risk assessment included +- [ ] Can approve, reject, or request changes + +**Story Points:** 5 + +#### US-006: Monitor Sprint Progress + +**As a** client +**I want to** monitor sprint progress in real-time +**So that** I know how the project is progressing + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Dashboard shows current sprint status +- [ ] Burndown chart visible +- [ ] Completed stories listed +- [ ] In-progress work visible +- [ ] Blockers highlighted +- [ ] Agent activity feed available + +**Story Points:** 5 + +#### US-007: Review Pull Request + +**As a** client (FULL_CONTROL mode) +**I want to** review pull requests before merge +**So that** I can ensure code quality + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] PR notification received +- [ ] Can view code diff +- [ ] Agent review comments visible +- [ ] CI status displayed +- [ ] Can approve or request changes +- [ ] Can add comments + +**Story Points:** 5 + +### 9.4 Epic: Issue Management + +#### US-008: Create Issue Manually + +**As a** client +**I want to** create issues manually +**So that** I can report bugs or request features + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Can create Epic, Story, Task, or Bug +- [ ] Can set priority and labels +- [ ] Can assign to sprint +- [ ] Issue synced to external tracker +- [ ] Agent assigned automatically (optional) + +**Story Points:** 3 + +#### US-009: View Issue Board + +**As a** client +**I want to** view all issues on a kanban board +**So that** I can see project status at a glance + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Columns for each status +- [ ] Drag-and-drop supported +- [ ] Filters by type, priority, assignee +- [ ] Search functionality +- [ ] Quick issue details on hover + +**Story Points:** 5 + +### 9.5 Epic: Artifact Delivery + +#### US-010: Receive Project Deliverables + +**As a** client +**I want to** receive all project artifacts +**So that** I have everything needed to maintain the software + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Source code in Git repository +- [ ] Documentation (README, API docs, ADRs) +- [ ] Test suite with coverage report +- [ ] Deployment configuration +- [ ] Changelog +- [ ] Download as ZIP option + +**Story Points:** 5 + +### 9.6 Epic: Agent Management (Admin) + +#### US-011: Configure Agent Type + +**As an** administrator +**I want to** configure agent types +**So that** I can customize agent behavior + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Can create new agent type +- [ ] Can set base and failover models +- [ ] Can define expertise areas +- [ ] Can configure personality +- [ ] Can set system prompt +- [ ] Can activate/deactivate types + +**Story Points:** 8 + +#### US-012: Monitor Agent Health + +**As an** administrator +**I want to** monitor agent health and performance +**So that** I can ensure system reliability + +**Acceptance Criteria:** +- [ ] Dashboard shows all active agents +- [ ] Resource usage visible (tokens, API calls) +- [ ] Error rates displayed +- [ ] Failover events logged +- [ ] Alerts configurable + +**Story Points:** 5 + +--- + +## 10. Acceptance Criteria + +### 10.1 System-Level Acceptance Criteria + +| ID | Criteria | Verification Method | +|----|----------|---------------------| +| SAC-001 | System creates project in < 30 seconds | Automated test | +| SAC-002 | Agent instances spawn in < 10 seconds | Automated test | +| SAC-003 | Issues sync with external tracker within 60 seconds | Integration test | +| SAC-004 | All API endpoints return < 200ms (95th percentile) | Load test | +| SAC-005 | System supports 10+ concurrent projects | Load test | +| SAC-006 | Agent failover occurs within 5 seconds | Chaos test | +| SAC-007 | All artifacts delivered on project completion | E2E test | +| SAC-008 | Audit trail complete for all sensitive actions | Security audit | + +### 10.2 Feature-Level Acceptance Criteria + +#### Project Management + +| ID | Feature | Criteria | +|----|---------|----------| +| PAC-001 | Project Creation | Project created with all required fields | +| PAC-002 | Complexity Assessment | Correct complexity level assigned | +| PAC-003 | Autonomy Configuration | Correct approval requirements enforced | +| PAC-004 | Client Mode | Communication adapted to client proficiency | + +#### Agent Management + +| ID | Feature | Criteria | +|----|---------|----------| +| AAC-001 | Agent Spawning | Instance created with unique identity | +| AAC-002 | Agent Communication | Messages delivered and logged | +| AAC-003 | Agent RAG | Domain knowledge queries return relevant results | +| AAC-004 | Agent Failover | Backup model used on primary failure | + +#### Issue Tracking + +| ID | Feature | Criteria | +|----|---------|----------| +| IAC-001 | Issue Hierarchy | Parent-child relationships maintained | +| IAC-002 | External Sync | Changes reflected in external tracker | +| IAC-003 | Issue CRUD | All operations audited | +| IAC-004 | Comments | Synced with external tracker | + +#### Git Integration + +| ID | Feature | Criteria | +|----|---------|----------| +| GAC-001 | Repository Creation | Repo created on selected provider | +| GAC-002 | Branch Management | Branches follow naming convention | +| GAC-003 | PR Workflow | PRs linked to issues | +| GAC-004 | Merge Strategy | Commits follow conventional format | + +--- + +## 11. Constraints and Assumptions + +### 11.1 Technical Constraints + +| ID | Constraint | Impact | Mitigation | +|----|------------|--------|------------| +| TC-001 | PostgreSQL 15+ required | Database compatibility | Document requirements | +| TC-002 | Python 3.11+ required | Backend deployment | Container images | +| TC-003 | Node.js 20+ required | Frontend deployment | Container images | +| TC-004 | LLM API rate limits | Agent throughput | Rate limiting, caching | +| TC-005 | MCP SDK compatibility | Integration options | Version pinning | +| TC-006 | pgvector extension required | Hosting requirements | Managed PostgreSQL | + +### 11.2 Business Constraints + +| ID | Constraint | Impact | Mitigation | +|----|------------|--------|------------| +| BC-001 | Internal tool only (v1) | No multi-tenant features | Design for future expansion | +| BC-002 | No SaaS deployment (v1) | Self-hosted only | Docker deployment | +| BC-003 | Limited to English (v1) | User base restriction | i18n infrastructure in place | +| BC-004 | Gitea priority | Provider flexibility | Abstraction layer | + +### 11.3 Assumptions + +| ID | Assumption | Risk if Invalid | Validation | +|----|------------|-----------------|------------| +| AS-001 | LLM APIs maintain current capabilities | Agent quality degradation | Continuous testing | +| AS-002 | Gitea API stable | Integration breakage | Version pinning, tests | +| AS-003 | Users have basic Git knowledge | Usability issues | Documentation, auto mode | +| AS-004 | Network connectivity to LLM providers | Service unavailability | Local model fallback | +| AS-005 | Docker available in deployment environment | Deployment complexity | Alternative deployment docs | + +### 11.4 Dependencies + +| ID | Dependency | Type | Owner | Risk | +|----|------------|------|-------|------| +| DP-001 | Anthropic API | External | Anthropic | Medium | +| DP-002 | OpenAI API (failover) | External | OpenAI | Low | +| DP-003 | Gitea Server | External | Self-hosted | Low | +| DP-004 | PostgreSQL | Infrastructure | Self-hosted | Low | +| DP-005 | Redis | Infrastructure | Self-hosted | Low | +| DP-006 | MCP SDK | Library | Anthropic | Medium | + +--- + +## 12. Risks and Mitigations + +### 12.1 Technical Risks + +| ID | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation | +|----|------|-------------|--------|------------| +| TR-001 | LLM API unavailability | Medium | High | Failover models, local fallback | +| TR-002 | Agent produces incorrect code | High | Medium | Peer review, automated testing | +| TR-003 | Knowledge base drift | Medium | Medium | Regular reindexing, validation | +| TR-004 | External sync conflicts | Medium | Low | Conflict resolution, manual override | +| TR-005 | Performance degradation at scale | Low | High | Load testing, optimization | +| TR-006 | Security vulnerabilities | Low | Critical | Security audits, penetration testing | + +### 12.2 Business Risks + +| ID | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation | +|----|------|-------------|--------|------------| +| BR-001 | Users don't trust AI output | Medium | High | Transparency, review gates | +| BR-002 | Cost overruns from API usage | Medium | Medium | Usage monitoring, budgets | +| BR-003 | Adoption resistance | Low | High | Training, gradual rollout | +| BR-004 | Compliance requirements change | Low | Medium | Modular architecture | + +### 12.3 Project Risks + +| ID | Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation | +|----|------|-------------|--------|------------| +| PR-001 | Scope creep | High | Medium | Clear requirements, change control | +| PR-002 | Technical debt accumulation | Medium | Medium | Code reviews, refactoring sprints | +| PR-003 | Integration complexity | Medium | High | Spike investigations, POCs | +| PR-004 | Testing inadequacy | Low | High | Coverage requirements, E2E tests | + +### 12.4 Risk Response Matrix + +| Response | Actions | +|----------|---------| +| **Avoid** | Change approach to eliminate risk | +| **Mitigate** | Reduce probability or impact | +| **Transfer** | Shift risk to third party | +| **Accept** | Acknowledge and monitor | + +--- + +## 13. Success Metrics + +### 13.1 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) + +#### Delivery Metrics + +| Metric | Target | Measurement | +|--------|--------|-------------| +| Project completion rate | > 90% | Projects completed / Projects started | +| Average delivery time | -50% vs manual | Time from start to completion | +| First-pass acceptance rate | > 85% | Deliverables accepted without rework | +| Bug escape rate | < 5% | Bugs found in production / Total bugs | + +#### Quality Metrics + +| Metric | Target | Measurement | +|--------|--------|-------------| +| Code coverage | > 80% | Automated test coverage | +| Documentation completeness | > 95% | Documented APIs / Total APIs | +| ADR compliance | 100% | Architecture decisions with ADRs | +| Security vulnerability density | < 1/1000 LOC | Vulnerabilities / Lines of code | + +#### Efficiency Metrics + +| Metric | Target | Measurement | +|--------|--------|-------------| +| Agent utilization | > 70% | Active time / Total time | +| Client intervention rate | < 20% (AUTONOMOUS) | Interventions / Total actions | +| Sprint velocity consistency | +/- 15% | Variance in completed points | +| Rework rate | < 10% | Reworked stories / Completed stories | + +#### User Satisfaction Metrics + +| Metric | Target | Measurement | +|--------|--------|-------------| +| Client satisfaction score | > 4.0/5.0 | Post-project survey | +| Feature adoption rate | > 80% | Users using feature / Total users | +| Time to first value | < 1 hour | Time to first useful output | +| Support ticket volume | < 5/project | Support requests per project | + +### 13.2 Operational Metrics + +| Metric | Target | Measurement | +|--------|--------|-------------| +| System uptime | > 99.5% | Uptime / Total time | +| API response time (p95) | < 200ms | 95th percentile latency | +| Error rate | < 0.1% | Errors / Total requests | +| Agent failover success rate | > 99% | Successful failovers / Failover attempts | + +### 13.3 Business Metrics + +| Metric | Target | Measurement | +|--------|--------|-------------| +| Cost per project | -30% vs traditional | Total cost / Projects delivered | +| Time to market | -50% vs traditional | Average delivery time | +| Resource efficiency | 3x improvement | Output / Human hours | +| ROI | > 300% (Year 1) | Value delivered / Investment | + +--- + +## 14. Glossary + +| Term | Definition | +|------|------------| +| **ADR** | Architecture Decision Record - A document capturing an important architectural decision with context, decision, and consequences | +| **Agent Instance** | A running instance of an agent type, assigned to a specific project with unique identity | +| **Agent Type** | A template definition for AI agents including model, expertise, and personality configuration | +| **Autonomy Level** | Configuration determining how much human approval is required for agent actions | +| **Backlog** | Prioritized list of work items (epics, stories, tasks) for a project | +| **Burndown Chart** | Visual representation of work remaining vs time in a sprint | +| **CI/CD** | Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment - Automated build, test, and deploy pipelines | +| **Client Mode** | User proficiency setting (Technical or Auto) affecting communication style | +| **Complexity Level** | Project classification (Script/Simple/Medium/Complex) determining workflow | +| **Conventional Commit** | Standardized commit message format with type, scope, and description | +| **Epic** | Large body of work that can be broken down into smaller stories | +| **External Tracker** | Third-party issue tracking system (Gitea Issues, GitHub Issues, GitLab Issues) | +| **Failover Model** | Backup LLM model used when primary model is unavailable | +| **GitFlow** | Git branching model with feature, develop, release, and hotfix branches | +| **Issue Hierarchy** | Parent-child relationship between Epics, Stories, and Tasks | +| **MCP** | Model Context Protocol - Anthropic's protocol for LLM tool integration | +| **MoSCoW** | Prioritization method: Must Have, Should Have, Could Have, Won't Have | +| **pgvector** | PostgreSQL extension for vector similarity search (used for RAG) | +| **PR** | Pull Request - Code change proposal for review before merging | +| **PragmaStack** | Base template used for Syndarix (FastAPI + Next.js full-stack) | +| **RAG** | Retrieval-Augmented Generation - Enhancing LLM with external knowledge | +| **RBAC** | Role-Based Access Control - Authorization based on user roles | +| **Singleton MCP** | MCP server pattern where one server instance serves all projects | +| **Spike** | Time-boxed research activity to reduce technical uncertainty | +| **Sprint** | Fixed-length iteration (typically 1-2 weeks) for completing backlog items | +| **Story** | User-facing feature or capability described from user perspective | +| **Story Points** | Relative estimation unit for effort/complexity | +| **Sync Status** | State of synchronization between local and external issue tracker | +| **Task** | Technical work item, typically part of a story | +| **Velocity** | Measure of work completed per sprint (in story points) | +| **Workspace** | Isolated file system area for a project | + +--- + +## Appendices + +### Appendix A: Technology Stack Reference + +| Layer | Technology | Version | Purpose | +|-------|------------|---------|---------| +| Backend Framework | FastAPI | 0.115+ | REST API, WebSocket | +| Backend Language | Python | 3.11+ | Server-side logic | +| Frontend Framework | Next.js | 16 | React application | +| Frontend Language | TypeScript | 5.0+ | Type-safe frontend | +| Database | PostgreSQL | 15+ | Primary data store | +| Vector Extension | pgvector | Latest | Embedding storage | +| Cache/Queue | Redis | 7.0+ | Caching, Celery broker | +| Task Queue | Celery | 5.3+ | Background jobs | +| ORM | SQLAlchemy | 2.0+ | Database operations | +| Validation | Pydantic | 2.0+ | Data validation | +| State Management | Zustand | 4.0+ | Frontend state | +| Data Fetching | TanStack Query | 5.0+ | API data caching | +| UI Components | shadcn/ui | Latest | Design system | +| CSS | Tailwind CSS | 4.0+ | Styling | +| Testing (Backend) | pytest | 8.0+ | Unit/integration tests | +| Testing (Frontend) | Jest | 29+ | Unit tests | +| Testing (E2E) | Playwright | 1.40+ | End-to-end tests | +| Containerization | Docker | 24+ | Deployment | + +### Appendix B: API Endpoint Summary + +| Category | Endpoint | Method | Description | +|----------|----------|--------|-------------| +| **Auth** | /api/v1/auth/login | POST | User authentication | +| | /api/v1/auth/refresh | POST | Token refresh | +| | /api/v1/auth/logout | POST | Session termination | +| **Projects** | /api/v1/projects | GET | List projects | +| | /api/v1/projects | POST | Create project | +| | /api/v1/projects/{id} | GET | Get project details | +| | /api/v1/projects/{id} | PATCH | Update project | +| | /api/v1/projects/{id} | DELETE | Archive project | +| **Agents** | /api/v1/agent-types | GET | List agent types | +| | /api/v1/agent-types | POST | Create agent type | +| | /api/v1/agents | GET | List agent instances | +| | /api/v1/agents/{id} | GET | Get instance details | +| | /api/v1/agents/{id}/messages | GET | Get agent messages | +| **Issues** | /api/v1/projects/{id}/issues | GET | List project issues | +| | /api/v1/projects/{id}/issues | POST | Create issue | +| | /api/v1/issues/{id} | GET | Get issue details | +| | /api/v1/issues/{id} | PATCH | Update issue | +| | /api/v1/issues/{id}/comments | GET | List comments | +| | /api/v1/issues/{id}/comments | POST | Add comment | +| **Sprints** | /api/v1/projects/{id}/sprints | GET | List sprints | +| | /api/v1/projects/{id}/sprints | POST | Create sprint | +| | /api/v1/sprints/{id} | GET | Get sprint details | +| **Git** | /api/v1/projects/{id}/repositories | GET | List repositories | +| | /api/v1/repositories/{id}/branches | GET | List branches | +| | /api/v1/repositories/{id}/prs | GET | List pull requests | + +### Appendix C: Configuration Reference + +```yaml +# syndarix.config.yaml + +app: + name: Syndarix + environment: development # development | staging | production + debug: true + secret_key: ${SECRET_KEY} + +database: + url: postgresql+asyncpg://${POSTGRES_USER}:${POSTGRES_PASSWORD}@${POSTGRES_HOST}:${POSTGRES_PORT}/${POSTGRES_DB} + pool_size: 20 + max_overflow: 50 + +redis: + url: redis://${REDIS_HOST}:${REDIS_PORT}/0 + +llm: + providers: + anthropic: + api_key: ${ANTHROPIC_API_KEY} + models: + - claude-3-5-sonnet-20241022 + - claude-3-opus-20240229 + openai: + api_key: ${OPENAI_API_KEY} + models: + - gpt-4-turbo + - gpt-4 + +git: + default_provider: gitea + providers: + gitea: + base_url: ${GITEA_URL} + token: ${GITEA_TOKEN} + github: + token: ${GITHUB_TOKEN} + gitlab: + base_url: ${GITLAB_URL} + token: ${GITLAB_TOKEN} + +mcp: + enabled: true + servers: + llm_gateway: + enabled: true + port: 9001 + git: + enabled: true + port: 9002 + issues: + enabled: true + port: 9003 + knowledge_base: + enabled: true + port: 9004 + file_system: + enabled: true + port: 9005 + code_analysis: + enabled: true + port: 9006 + cicd: + enabled: true + port: 9007 + +agents: + default_autonomy: MILESTONE + max_instances_per_type: 5 + context_window: 100000 + token_budget_per_project: 10000000 + +security: + jwt: + access_token_expire_minutes: 15 + refresh_token_expire_days: 7 + rate_limiting: + default: "60/minute" + auth: "10/minute" + cors: + allowed_origins: + - http://localhost:3000 +``` + +### Appendix D: Open Questions + +| ID | Question | Owner | Status | Resolution | +|----|----------|-------|--------|------------| +| OQ-001 | Maximum project size limits? | Architecture | Open | - | +| OQ-002 | Offline mode requirements? | Product | Open | - | +| OQ-003 | Audit log retention policy? | Security | Open | - | +| OQ-004 | Agent conversation export format? | Product | Open | - | +| OQ-005 | Custom MCP tool support? | Architecture | Open | - | + +--- + +**Document Control** + +| Version | Date | Author | Changes | +|---------|------|--------|---------| +| 1.0 | 2024-12-01 | Product Team | Initial version | +| 2.0 | 2025-12-29 | Product Team | Comprehensive rewrite with all decisions incorporated | + +--- + +*This document is the authoritative source of truth for Syndarix requirements. All implementation decisions should be validated against this document.*